Skip to content

Campaigning Wiki

4 min read

lang: en

Summary

From 2008 to 2011, indigenous tribes of the Brazilian Amazon, led by the Kayapo and Chief Raoni, organized a nonviolent campaign to stop the construction of the Belo Monte Dam on the Xingu River. They aimed to protect their ancestral lands and the environment from flooding and displacement. Despite massive protests, international support, and legal challenges, the Brazilian government granted the final installation license in June 2011, and construction proceeded. The campaign failed to halt the dam but succeeded in raising global awareness and building a lasting indigenous alliance.

Background

The Belo Monte Dam was proposed as part of Brazil’s Accelerated Growth Programme to increase energy supply, but its construction on the Xingu River would flood indigenous lands, displace 20,000 tribe members, and destroy wildlife and vegetation. Indigenous tribes, including the Kayapo, Juruna, Araweté, Xikrin, Asurini, Parakanã, and Arara, opposed the dam to protect their ancestral territory and way of life. The campaign aimed to prevent the dam’s construction by pressuring the Brazilian government and Norte Energia.

What happened

In May 2008, the largest-ever meeting of indigenous peoples in the Brazilian Amazon took place, forming an alliance against the dam [source: nv-database]. In early 2010, IBAMA granted a provisional environmental license to Norte Energia, but the Brazilian Federal Attorney General’s Office suspended it, citing unconstitutionality; however, an appellate court reinstated the project later that day [source: nv-database]. On August 12, 2010, indigenous peoples released an Indian Declaration against Belo Monte, yet President Lula signed the contract with Norte Energia on August 26 [source: nv-database]. In October 2010, an Independent Expert Panel Report revealed that the Environmental Impact Analysis failed to address the drying of 100 kilometers of the Xingu River’s ‘Big Bend’ area [source: nv-database]. On February 8, 2011, hundreds of citizens and indigenous people marched on the Presidential Palace, presenting a petition signed by 1 million people and a letter from 87 civil society organizations [source: nv-database]. On February 25, 2011, the Federal Public Prosecutor filed its eleventh lawsuit, and federal judge Ronaldo Desterro blocked the project, but a week later the President of a Federal Regional Court overturned the decision [source: nv-database]. On April 1, 2011, the IACHR granted precautionary measures requesting a halt to construction, but IBAMA granted the full installation license on June 1, 2011 [source: nv-database]. In the fall of 2011, after protests in over 17 countries, Chief Raoni visited the United Nations in Geneva to inform representatives of the risks [source: nv-database]. The campaign used sit-ins, letters to the UN, public letters to the President, and support from celebrities like Bill Clinton, Sigourney Weaver, James Cameron, and Colin Firth [source: nv-database]. Despite these efforts, the Brazilian government failed to protect indigenous rights and the dam proceeded [source: nv-database].

Key people & organizations

  • Kayapo Chief Raoni Metuktire
  • Kayapo Indians
  • Xingu Para Sempre
  • Brazilian Federal Public Prosecutor
  • Amazon Watch
  • World Wildlife Fund
  • Inter American Commission of Human Rights (IACHR)
  • Interamerican Association of Environmental Defense (AIDA)
  • Brazilian federal judge Ronaldo Destêrro
  • James Cameron
  • Bill Clinton
  • Sigourney Weaver
  • Arnold Schwarzenegger
  • President Dilma Rousseff
  • Former President Lula da Silva
  • Consortium Norte Energia
  • Eletrobras
  • IBAMA
  • BNDES
  • Fundação Nacional do Índio

Tactics used

The campaign combined mass indigenous assemblies, marches, petitions, and legal challenges with international celebrity advocacy and media outreach to build pressure on the Brazilian government and Norte Energia. This multi-pronged approach aimed to leverage both domestic legal avenues and global public opinion to halt the dam. [source: nv-database]

Outcome

Verdict: lost.

The campaign achieved 0 out of 6 points for success in specific demands, as the Belo Monte Dam was built despite all opposition. However, it scored 1 out of 1 for survival and 3 out of 3 for growth, indicating that the movement endured and expanded its network. The dam’s construction proceeded because the Brazilian government and courts consistently overruled legal suspensions and ignored international appeals, demonstrating the limits of nonviolent pressure against a determined state. [source: nv-database]

Lessons

  • Building alliances across indigenous tribes and with international NGOs can amplify a campaign’s reach and legitimacy.
  • Legal challenges alone may be insufficient if the government is willing to override court rulings and constitutional provisions.
  • Celebrity endorsements and international media attention can raise global awareness but may not sway a determined national government.

Sources

Disclaimer: Included as a teaching example of campaign craft, not as endorsement.

Sources & verification

  • nv-database — grounding: primary — license: link-only
  • Rewritten: 2026-06-25 via worker_casestudies_v2.py

Graph View

Backlinks