Skip to content

Campaigning Wiki

4 min read

lang: en

Summary

In 1921, nearly all unionized coal miners in Kansas struck to demand the release of labor leader Alexander Howat from prison and the abolition of the Kansas Industrial Court, which banned strikes. When the strike faltered, thousands of women marched on mines, closing about sixty mines over three days. The campaign eventually led to Howat’s release, a U.S. Supreme Court ruling against the Industrial Court, and the court’s disbandment in 1925.

Background

In early 1920, Kansas established the Kansas Industrial Court, a compulsory arbitration board that banned strikes. Miners believed the right to strike was constitutionally grounded. In September 1921, after labor leader Alexander Howat was jailed for violating a strike injunction, nearly all unionized Kansas miners walked off their jobs to demand his release and the court’s abolition.

What happened

The strike began in September 1921 when Alexander Howat was convicted and jailed for calling a small-scale strike to test the Kansas Industrial Court’s legality. [source: nv-database] Nearly all Kansas coal miners struck in solidarity, demanding Howat’s release and the abolition of the court [source: nv-database]. The strike was weakened when UMWA President John L. [source: nv-database] Lewis suspended Howat and the striking miners from the national union, cutting off strike benefits [source: nv-database]. By early December 1921, many mines had resumed operation as strikers returned and companies imported workers [source: nv-database]. On 12 December 1921, several thousand women gathered in Franklin, carrying American flags and singing patriotic songs, then marched to local mines, declaring them closed and urging miners to support the strike [source: nv-database]. Over three days, the women marched on and closed approximately sixty mines, bringing coal production to a standstill [source: nv-database]. The women used their gender as a tool, bringing children and babies to discourage violence [source: nv-database]. Some violent encounters occurred, including throwing red pepper and lunch pails, and brawls broke out [source: nv-database]. Governor Allen dispatched four companies of the Kansas National Guard, including a machine gun division, to subdue the marchers [source: nv-database]. When the National Guard arrived on 15 December, the women ceased marching to avoid a violent showdown [source: nv-database]. Officials arrested over fifty people, conducted daily home searches, and deported non-citizens [source: nv-database]. The National Guard began leaving on 4 January 1922, and on 12 January, Howat called miners back to work, having proven the court’s ineffectiveness [source: nv-database]. The movement continued through the 1922 elections, with women traveling across Kansas to campaign against pro-court candidates, successfully unseating several incumbents and helping elect a labor-friendly governor [source: nv-database]. In 1924, Howat and his allies won a U.S. [source: nv-database] Supreme Court case (Dorchy v. [source: nv-database] Kansas), and in 1925, the Kansas legislature disbanded the Industrial Court [source: nv-database].

Key people & organizations

  • Alexander Howat
  • Mary Skubtiz
  • Fannie Wimler
  • P.L. Howe
  • Mother Jones
  • John L. Lewis
  • Governor Henry Allen
  • Kansas Industrial Court
  • United Mine Workers of America

Tactics used

The miners’ strike created economic pressure, while the women’s march used nonviolent direct action and gender-based tactics to close mines and draw national attention. The combination of industrial strike and women’s mobilization, followed by electoral campaigning, built sustained pressure on the state. [source: nv-database]

Outcome

Verdict: won.

The campaign achieved all six of its demands: Howat was released from prison, the Kansas Industrial Court was disbanded in 1925, and the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against the court. The campaign also survived and grew, earning a total of 10 out of 10 points in the success evaluation. [source: nv-database]

Lessons

  • Women’s involvement can reinvigorate a faltering strike by using gender as a protective and persuasive tool.
  • Combining industrial action with electoral campaigning can achieve long-term policy change.
  • Framing the struggle in terms of constitutional rights and historical narratives (e.g., abolitionism) can build broad public support.

Sources

Disclaimer: Included as a teaching example of campaign craft, not as endorsement.

Sources & verification

  • nv-database — grounding: primary — license: link-only
  • Rewritten: 2026-06-25 via worker_casestudies_v2.py

Graph View

Backlinks