Skip to content

Campaigning Wiki

4 min read

lang: en

Summary

From 2011 to 2016, residents of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, organized a nonviolent campaign against the 2014 World Cup and 2016 Olympics, demanding an end to forced evictions, police violence, and the privatization of public spaces. Led by the World Cup and Olympics Popular Committee of Rio de Janeiro, the campaign used marches, petitions, dossiers, and symbolic actions to highlight human rights violations. Despite some successes in raising awareness and building a movement, most demands were not met, and the campaign is considered a partial success.

Background

Rio de Janeiro was declared host city for the 2014 World Cup and 2016 Olympics, leading to a ‘state of exception’ that allowed human rights violations in preparation for the events. Over 30,000 favela residents faced forced evictions and displacement, while the World Cup Law enabled FIFA and the IOC to profit without taxes. The World Cup and Olympics Popular Committee of Rio de Janeiro formed in 2010 to mobilize social organizations and protect affected communities [source: nv-database].

What happened

In April 2011, the Popular Committee submitted a letter of human rights violations to the UN Special Rapporteur for Adequate Housing [source: nv-database]. On 12 April 2012, they launched the Mega-Events and Human Rights Violations Dossier series [source: nv-database]. In November 2015, a second dossier reported that 77,206 people were removed from Rio between 2009 and 2015 [source: nv-database]. On 5 August 2015, the committee organized a march of 400 people to the Games Organizing Committee [source: nv-database]. On 5 July 2016, the ‘30 Days before the Exclusion Games’ campaign began [source: nv-database]. On 27 July 2016, Amnesty International activists placed 40 body bags in front of the Games Organizing Committee to symbolize police killings [source: nv-database]. During the World Cup final in 2014, nonviolent protestors in Saens Peña Square faced hundreds of officers in riot gear [source: nv-database]. Teacher strikes began on 2 March 2016 over pay raises and expanded to include other issues [source: nv-database]. On 29 June 2016, a peaceful protest at the Court of Justice ended with police using tear gas and batons [source: nv-database]. In June 2016, the Rio state government declared a state of calamity due to financial mismanagement [source: nv-database]. After the games, the Olympic Park was closed to the public during weekdays and fell into disrepair [source: nv-database].

Key people & organizations

  • World Cup and Olympics Popular Committee of Rio de Janeiro
  • Rio Olympics Neighborhood Watch
  • Catalytic Communities
  • Amnesty International
  • International Federation of Association Football (FIFA)
  • International Olympics Committee (IOC)
  • Rio de Janeiro State government
  • Rio de Janeiro municipal government
  • Eduardo Paes
  • Sérgio Cabral

Tactics used

The campaign combined documentation of human rights abuses through dossiers with public marches, symbolic actions like body bags, and strikes to pressure authorities and draw international attention. These tactics aimed to expose the gap between official promises and the reality of violence and displacement. [source: nv-database]

Outcome

Verdict: partial.

The campaign achieved partial success: it raised global awareness, built a strong coalition, and survived repression, but most of its 16 demands were not met. Forced evictions continued, the World Cup Law remained, and the state’s fiscal crisis persisted. The campaign is considered a partial success because it highlighted ongoing human rights violations and laid groundwork for future activism [source: nv-database].

Lessons

  • Documenting human rights violations in detailed dossiers can build a strong evidence base and attract international solidarity.
  • Coalition-building across social organizations, unions, and human rights groups amplifies the voice of affected communities.
  • Symbolic actions, such as delivering body bags, can effectively draw media attention to state violence.
  • Sustained nonviolent protest can survive severe repression and maintain pressure over multiple years.

Sources

Disclaimer: Included as a teaching example of campaign craft, not as endorsement.

Sources & verification

  • nv-database — grounding: primary — license: link-only
  • Rewritten: 2026-06-25 via worker_casestudies_v2.py

Graph View

Backlinks