Skip to content

Campaigning Wiki

4 min read

lang: en

Summary

From 1959 to 1961, interracial student groups in Austin, Texas, conducted sit-ins, picketing, and selective patronage campaigns to desegregate lunch counters. The campaign achieved partial success, with thirty-two lunch counters desegregated by mid-1960, though the movement then shifted focus to desegregating movie theaters. The exact date of complete lunch counter desegregation is unclear.

Background

The University of Texas admitted black graduate students in 1955 and undergraduates in 1956, but campus facilities remained segregated and unequal. Black students were barred from athletics and drama, and dorms were segregated and inferior. The campaign aimed to desegregate lunch counters in Austin, particularly on and near Congress Avenue.

What happened

Scattered sit-ins began in spring 1959, with activists and black students sitting in at cafes without being served, calling themselves ‘the fellowship of sitters’ [source: nv-database]. In January 1960, the UT Student Assembly created a rating system that gave higher points to integrated restaurants, awarding a ‘Steer Here’ classification [source: nv-database]. After the Greensboro sit-ins on February 1, 1960, the focus on lunch counters increased [source: nv-database]. In April 1960, the Austin Committee on Human Relations hosted a meeting between student groups and lunch counter owners, which students considered unsuccessful [source: nv-database]. Students issued an ultimatum for integration within a week, and when no action was taken, they began picketing on Congress Avenue with signs [source: nv-database]. The first large sit-in occurred on April 29, 1960, with 75 to 100 students occupying seven lunch counters; most owners shut down in response [source: nv-database]. Sit-ins continued through April and May, and a few pharmacies (Bray and Jordan) agreed to serve all customers [source: nv-database]. Student groups sent a letter to Senator Lyndon Baines Johnson asking for his support [source: nv-database]. Mayor Tom Miller and former Texas Supreme Court Associate Justice W. [source: nv-database] St. [source: nv-database] John Garwood formed a ‘biracial action group’ that helped desegregate thirty-two lunch counters by mid-May, after which the group disbanded [source: nv-database]. In November 1960, Students for Direct Action formed, intentionally independent from the university, and petitioned students to patronize at least one integrated restaurant per week [source: nv-database]. The University Religious Council distributed 3,800 cards for patrons to give to cashiers stating support for integration [source: nv-database]. The campaign then shifted focus to desegregating movie theaters, with stand-ins beginning in December 1960 and a ‘second phase’ launched on February 1, 1961 [source: nv-database]. The exact date of complete lunch counter desegregation is unclear [source: nv-database].

Key people & organizations

  • William Clebsch
  • Casey Hayden
  • Houston Wade
  • Chandler Davidson
  • University Religious Council
  • University of Texas
  • St. Edwards University
  • Huston-Tillotson College
  • Austin Human Relations Commission
  • Students for Direct Action
  • Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee
  • Lyndon Baines Johnson
  • Tom Miller
  • W. St. John Garwood

Tactics used

The campaign combined sit-ins, picketing, selective patronage, and leafleting to apply economic and moral pressure on lunch counter owners, while coalition-building with community leaders and political figures amplified their demands. [source: nv-database]

Outcome

Verdict: partial.

The campaign achieved partial success: thirty-two lunch counters desegregated by mid-1960, but the movement reoriented to focus on movie theaters before complete desegregation of all lunch counters was achieved. The outcome is rated partial because the specific goal of full lunch counter desegregation was not fully realized within the campaign’s timeframe. [source: nv-database]

Lessons

  • Coalitions with sympathetic elites (e.g., mayor, former judge) can accelerate desegregation by mediating between protesters and business owners.
  • Creating independent student organizations (like Students for Direct Action) allows activists to act without institutional constraints.
  • Combining direct action with consumer campaigns (e.g., selective patronage, rating systems) can incentivize businesses to integrate.

Sources

Disclaimer: Included as a teaching example of campaign craft, not as endorsement.

Sources & verification

  • nv-database — grounding: primary — license: link-only
  • Rewritten: 2026-06-25 via worker_casestudies_v2.py

Graph View

Backlinks