Skip to content

Campaigning Wiki

4 min read

lang: en

Summary

In 1969-1970, British activists led by Peter Hain’s Stop the Seventy Tour campaign disrupted the South African Springbok rugby tour of the British Isles to protest apartheid. The campaign aimed to cancel the upcoming 1970 South African cricket tour through nonviolent obstruction and demonstrations. The rugby tour was marked by pitch invasions, sit-ins, and other disruptions, leading to the cancellation of the cricket tour. The campaign succeeded in isolating South African sports and contributed to the broader anti-apartheid movement.

Background

South Africa’s apartheid government, led by the National Party, faced growing international opposition after 1964, including suspension from the International Olympic Committee. In Great Britain, the 1967 ‘D’Oliveira Affair’—where the apartheid government barred colored cricketer Basil D’Oliveira from playing against all-white teams—sparked outrage and led to the cancellation of an English cricket tour of South Africa. The announcement of the 1969-1970 Springbok rugby tour and a subsequent 1970 cricket tour reignited controversy, with opponents viewing the rugby tour as a chance to set the tone for the cricket tour [source: nv-database].

What happened

The campaign, led by 19-year-old Peter Hain as chairman of Stop the Seventy Tour (STST), treated the rugby tour as a dress rehearsal for the cricket tour, aiming to force its cancellation through demonstrations [source: nv-database]. Demonstrators frequently invaded the rugby pitch during matches, forcing games to stop and leading to fields being surrounded by barbed wire [source: nv-database]. In December 1969, the Springbok team bus was hijacked in Twickenham; player Tommy Bedford forced a crash, but no one was injured [source: nv-database]. Protesters glued shut hotel door locks of South African players and placed sharp thumbtacks on a rugby field [source: nv-database]. In Coventry, campaigners held an anti-apartheid torchlight procession; demonstrator Adrian Smith recalled the amazement on Springbok players’ faces as they watched from their hotel balcony [source: nv-database]. Some players and coaches also protested: Welsh flanker John Taylor abstained from playing against South Africa, and coach Carwyn James refused to leave the locker room during his team’s match [source: nv-database]. The campaign was described as ‘one of the most bitter sporting tours in the history of this country (England)’ [source: nv-database]. The 1970 cricket tour was cancelled due to the potential for similar demonstrations [source: nv-database].

Key people & organizations

  • Peter Hain
  • Stop the Seventy Tour (STST)
  • Fair Cricket Campaign
  • Bishop of Woolwich
  • E.W. Stanton
  • Ted Dexter
  • John Arlott
  • London Branch of national Union of Journalists
  • Institute of Race Relations
  • British Council of Churches
  • Freedom under Law (FUL)
  • South African apartheid government (National Party)
  • Springbok rugby team

Tactics used

The campaign combined nonviolent direct action—such as pitch invasions, sit-ins, and obstruction—with coalition-building involving the Catholic Church, anti-apartheid groups, and sympathetic elites, creating widespread disruption that made the tours untenable. The scattered, decentralized nature of participants made it difficult for authorities to counter the protests effectively [source: nv-database].

Outcome

Verdict: won.

The campaign achieved its specific goal: the 1970 South African cricket tour was cancelled, and the rugby tour was severely disrupted, scoring 6 out of 6 points for success in achieving demands [source: nv-database]. The campaign also survived and grew, earning a total of 10 out of 10 points [source: nv-database]. This victory was followed by numerous other anti-apartheid protests in sports competition [source: nv-database].

Lessons

  • Treating a preliminary event as a ‘dress rehearsal’ can build momentum and demonstrate the costs of continuing a contested activity.
  • Decentralized, loosely coordinated actions can be harder for authorities to suppress than a single centralized campaign.
  • Gaining support from respected institutions (e.g., the Church) and elites (e.g., MPs, sports figures) adds legitimacy to a protest movement.

Sources

Disclaimer: Included as a teaching example of campaign craft, not as endorsement.

Sources & verification

  • nv-database — grounding: primary — license: link-only
  • Rewritten: 2026-06-25 via worker_casestudies_v2.py

Graph View

Backlinks