lang: en
Summary
In 1980-81, the Guam Federation of Teachers (GFT) led a strike of public school teachers demanding a 30% cost-of-living wage increase. The strike lasted 58 days, involving picketing, a human chain around the legislature, and appeals that clogged civil service hearings. Despite these efforts, the teachers failed to achieve any pay raises or concessions, and the strike ended on March 10, 1981.
Background
In 1980, the government of Guam employed over 9,000 workers, about half of whom were teachers. Teachers’ pay lagged behind the national average, and the Guam Federation of Teachers (GFT) organized a petition for a 30% cost-of-living wage increase. After the petition failed, the government passed a 2,000 to $10,000 annually in December.
What happened
On December 19, 1980, the GFT staged a rally in Agana where hundreds of teachers voted to strike if not given a 30% wage increase [source: nv-database]. On January 7, 1981, a written vote passed to strike, though only 75% of members voted and 70% of those supported it [source: nv-database]. Governor Caldo obtained a court injunction declaring the strike illegal [source: nv-database]. On January 12, 758 of 1,464 classroom teachers did not report to work and formed picket lines; school bus drivers and university faculty also joined, and some Operating Engineers Local 3 members struck in solidarity [source: nv-database]. Education Director Katherine Aguon suspended and later fired nearly all strikers, hiring replacement teachers [source: nv-database]. The strike grew to over 900 participants [source: nv-database]. Teachers appealed their firings, clogging Civil Service hearings [source: nv-database]. On February 6, teachers formed a human chain around the legislature building; police arrested 61 protesters, many of whom went limp [source: nv-database]. Governor Caldo and GFT President Conrad Stinson opened discussions, but Caldo cut off negotiations when picketing began at officials’ homes [source: nv-database]. Fifteen University of Guam professors were fired after picketing the governor’s home [source: nv-database]. The American Federation of Teachers provided interest-free loans, but some teachers returned to work [source: nv-database]. On February 19, returning teachers were told they had been permanently replaced; fewer than 100 filled out re-hire forms [source: nv-database]. Negotiations reopened but the government outlasted the financially struggling teachers, and the strike ended on March 10, 1981 after 58 days [source: nv-database].
Key people & organizations
- Guam Federation of Teachers (GFT)
- Operating Engineers Local No. 3
- American Federation of Teachers (AFT)
- Governor Paul Caldo
- Education Director Katherine Aguon
- GFT Executive Director Marcia Hartsock
- Operating Engineers Local 3 President Tommy Long
- GFT President Conrad Stinson
- Chamorro Employees Labor Union (CHELU)
Tactics used
- boycotts-and-strikes
- nonviolent-direct-action
- civil-resistance
- coalition-building
- petitions-and-e-campaigning
The GFT used a professional strike as the primary tactic, supported by picketing, a human chain around the legislature, and overloading administrative systems with appeals. These actions aimed to disrupt normal operations and pressure the government, but the lack of full unity and financial strain limited their effectiveness. [source: nv-database]
Outcome
Verdict: lost.
The teachers failed to receive any pay raises or other concessions, resulting in a loss [source: nv-database]. The GFT paid a $35,000 fine for breaking the court injunction, its membership was greatly reduced, and public education remained weakened for years due to under-qualified replacement teachers and ongoing tension [source: nv-database].
Lessons
- Ethnic divisions among campaigners can undermine unity and effectiveness.
- Financial sustainability is critical for long strikes; external loans may not be sufficient.
- Court injunctions can be defied but may lead to fines and legal consequences.
Sources
- Global Nonviolent Action Database —
[[nv-database]]
Disclaimer: Included as a teaching example of campaign craft, not as endorsement.
Sources & verification
nv-database— grounding: primary — license: link-only- Rewritten: 2026-06-25 via
worker_casestudies_v2.py