Skip to content

Campaigning Wiki

3 min read

lang: en

Summary

From 1977 to 1989, students, faculty, and alumni at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, campaigned for the university to completely divest its investments in companies operating in apartheid South Africa. The campaign employed a wide range of nonviolent tactics including protests, sit-ins, shantytowns, hunger strikes, and alternative funds. Although Harvard never fully divested, it adopted a policy of selective divestment and made other concessions, resulting in a partial victory.

Tactics used

Tactics used

Background

In the late 1970s and 1980s, U.S. universities faced pressure to divest from companies supporting apartheid in South Africa. Harvard held millions in stock in such companies, and despite President Bok’s personal opposition to apartheid, the university refused full divestment, arguing it was ineffective and costly. Students, faculty, and alumni demanded complete divestment to pressure the South African government to end institutionalized racial segregation.

What happened

The campaign began in earnest in 1977 with the formation of the Southern Africa Solidarity Committee (SASC). [source: nv-database] In 1978, students planted black crosses in Harvard Yard to symbolize a cemetery, and on April 27, 1,500 students occupied Massachusetts Hall, barricading President Bok from his office. [source: nv-database] A torchlight procession of 3,000 people followed, and a shantytown was built in front of University Hall. [source: nv-database] Alumni elected divestment supporter Gay W. [source: nv-database] Seidman to the Board of Overseers. [source: nv-database] In 1979, a class boycott cut attendance by more than 50%, and faculty debated divestment in open meetings. [source: nv-database] In 1983, students held a weeklong hunger strike, and seniors created an alternative fund to withhold donations until divestment. [source: nv-database] In 1984, the Corporation selectively divested from 15 companies. [source: nv-database] In 1985, 5,000 students heard Jesse Jackson speak, and activists blockaded South African consul Abe Hoppenstein in Lowell House. [source: nv-database] In 1986, students rebuilt the shantytown. [source: nv-database] In 1989, Desmond Tutu won a seat on the Board of Overseers on a pro-divestment platform. [source: nv-database] Harvard never fully divested its $400 million in South Africa-related stock, but it did adopt partial divestment and other measures. [source: nv-database]

Key people & organizations

  • Southern Africa Solidarity Committee (SASC)
  • Advisory Committee on Shareholder Responsibility (ACSR)
  • Gay W. Seidman
  • Black Studies Association (BSA)
  • Donald Woods
  • Chris Nteta
  • Dennis Brutus
  • Elizabeth Sibeko
  • Reverend Jesse I. Jackson
  • Archbishop Desmond Tutu
  • President Derek C. Bok
  • Harvard Corporation

Outcome

Verdict: partial.

The campaign achieved partial divestment and policy changes but failed to secure complete divestment. Harvard argued that full divestment was costly and ineffective, and it maintained a policy of gradualism. The campaign survived and grew over more than a decade, drawing widespread participation and support, but ultimately fell short of its primary goal. [source: nv-database]

Lessons

  • Sustained, multi-tactic campaigns can achieve partial concessions even from entrenched institutional opponents.
  • Building coalitions across students, faculty, alumni, and external allies amplifies pressure and legitimacy.
  • Symbolic actions and direct disruption can keep an issue visible and force institutional responses.

Sources

Disclaimer: Included as a teaching example of campaign craft, not as endorsement.

Sources & verification

  • nv-database — grounding: primary — license: link-only
  • Rewritten: 2026-06-25 via worker_casestudies_v2.py

Graph View

Backlinks